Legal Opinion

Rose v. Socony-Vacuum Corp.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 2, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurdock, J.

These cases, described in the writs as trespass on the case for causing a nuisance, were heard together for the reason that the same questions of law are involved in each case. They are here on plaintiffs’ exceptions to a ruling of the Superior Court sustaining demurrers to the declarations which are summarized in plaintiffs’ brief as follows: “The plaintiff (Manuel Rose) for thirty years prior to and in June, 1930, owned a farm in East Providence, bounding southerly on the state highway, known as the Wampanoag Trail, comprising fifty-seven acres with a dwelling house, large barn and other…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Chatfield v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
  3. Roath v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  4. Phelps v. . NowlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. August Berger v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. Splendorio v. Bilray Demolition Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Swift & Co. v. Peoples Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Wilson Auto Enterprises, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
  5. Wood v. PicilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API