Rose v. Socony-Vacuum Corp.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtMurdock, J.
These cases, described in the writs as trespass on the case for causing a nuisance, were heard together for the reason that the same questions of law are involved in each case. They are here on plaintiffs’ exceptions to a ruling of the Superior Court sustaining demurrers to the declarations which are summarized in plaintiffs’ brief as follows: “The plaintiff (Manuel Rose) for thirty years prior to and in June, 1930, owned a farm in East Providence, bounding southerly on the state highway, known as the Wampanoag Trail, comprising fifty-seven acres with a dwelling house, large barn and other…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Chatfield v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
- Roath v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- Phelps v. . NowlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- August Berger v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Splendorio v. Bilray Demolition Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Swift & Co. v. Peoples Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Wilson Auto Enterprises, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
- Wood v. PicilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.