Legal Opinion

MacArtor v. The Graylyn Crest III Swim Club, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 14, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

This is the decision after final hearing on plaintiffs’ application to enjoin defendant Swim Club from further use of its well, to enjoin defendant from using its loud speaker altogether or at a greater than reasonable level and for damages in the sum of $73.49.

This case raises in capsule form very important problems of allocation of rights in percolating water. It is not susceptible of an easy solution, because the controlling test is “objective” reasonableness.

Plaintiffs live on the east side of Marsh Road in Brandywine Hundred and have for their water supply what I will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacArtor v. Graylyn Crest III Swim Club, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
  2. Macartor v. Graylyn Crest III Swim Club, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Artesian Water Co. v. Government of New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
  2. Corporation of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. AshtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. MacArtor v. Graylyn Crest III Swim Club, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
  4. CORPORATION OF PRESIDING BISHOP, ETC. v. AshtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Pottock v. Continental Can Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API