Legal Opinion

Yoffa v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 24, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is an action for disability benefits under a policy of life insurance. The policy provided that upon due proof that the insured "has . . . become totally and permanently disabled, as the result of bodily injury or disease occurring and originating after the issuance of said *111policy, so as to be prevented thereby from engaging in any occupation and performing any work for compensation or profit, and that such disability has already continued uninterruptedly for a period of at least three months, it [the defendant] will, during the continuance of such disability, . . . pay to the insured…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Weiner v. Pictorial Paper Package Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Rezendes v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hovhanesian v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FrischIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Summers v. Great Southern Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Hallihan v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkConnecticut Superior Court · 1941
  5. Summers v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API