Legal Opinion

St. Paul Dredging Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1961No. 38,011PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

St. Paul Dredging Company, plaintiff, seeks damages against the State of Minnesota for breach of a contract, S. P. 6947-06, for widening and grading shoulder of state Highway No. 216 for a distance of 17 miles beginning east of Hibbing. Plaintiff’s action is based upon its contention that contract specifications called for the defendant to furnish a highway worksite free from utility poles, that it failed to do so, and that in consequence plaintiff sustained damages.

The trial court construed the contract in accordance with plaintiff’s contentions and charged the jury…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Severin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  4. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Warren Bros. Roads Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Alamo Community College District v. Browning Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  3. Juengel Const. Co., Inc. v. Mt. Etna, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. v. Iten Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API