Carr v. Holt
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GLENN A. NORTON, Presiding Judge.
James Luther Holt appeals the summary judgment declaring that his conviction for assaulting Ernest Carr precluded re-litigation of the issue of Holt’s intent. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Holt was found guilty of second-degree assault after a jury trial. The facts of the incident that gave rise to the conviction are undisputed. 1 Carr, a police offi cer, was lawfully attempting to apprehend Holt as Holt fled the scene of a crime in a vehicle. Holt suddenly and unexpectedly stopped the car, put it in reverse and started travelling backwards towards Can', who…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- James v. PaulSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Wilkes v. St. Paul Fire & Marine, Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consumer Finance Corp. v. ReamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Leventhal v. Schenberg (In re Leventhal)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- K.C. Air Cargo Services, Inc. v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- Leventhal v. SchenbergDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012