Legal Opinion

Consumer Finance Corp. v. Reams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 2005No. WD 63487PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Tanisha Reams appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of respondent, Consumer Finance Corporation, granting its request for the deficiency remaining upon an automobile loan following repossession and disposition of the vehicle that was collateral for the loan. We conclude that the judgment was not supported by substantial evidence, in that there was insufficient evidence that the post-repossession sale was conducted in a commercially reasonable manner, and reverse the judgment below.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Tanisha Reams purchased an automobile on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. James v. PaulSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  3. In Re CaranchiniSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp. v. ParsonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Dean MacHinery Co. v. Union BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Missouri Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Alea London Ltd. v. Bono-Soltysiak EnterprisesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Billings Mutual Insurance Co. v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. STATE EX REL. KOSTER v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API