Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cooper

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1989No. 2528PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the Common Pleas Court that overturned a Municipal Court ruling that appellant’s retrial was barred by principles of double jeopardy. Appellant contends that retrial would violate his right against double jeopardy because, at his first trial, the municipal court sua sponte declared a mistrial in the absence of manifest necessity. For the reasons that follow, we agree and, accordingly, we reverse the order below and order appellant discharged.

*383Appellant was charged with driving under the influence, in violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731. On June…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. McCordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API