Legal Opinion

In re Keith H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 22, 1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

O’Brien, J.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether a petition based on hearsay allegations is constitutionally permissible in a proceeding under Family Court Act article 7 to adjudge a person in need of supervision (hereinafter PINS), even though a juvenile delinquency petition under Family Court Act article 3 must be based on nonhearsay allegations. We disagree with the determination of the Family Court that a petition based on nonhearsay allegations is required in a PINS proceeding and, accordingly, reverse.

I

This PINS proceeding was commenced by the principal of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Jeremy L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re Guy II.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re Jason O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re Jodel KK.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. In re Jennifer G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API