Legal Opinion

Murray v. Ledbetter

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2006No. S-11530, S-11609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Hershell Murray appeals a decision by the Alaska superior court that refused to enforce an Idaho judgment against Katherine Led-better because, in the court’s view, the judgment had been obtained by fraud on the Idaho court and had thereby deprived Katherine of an opportunity to be heard. But the trial court did not find an intentional fraud or a reckless misrepresentation. Moreover, Murray was not involved in the misrepresentation. And the record shows that Katherine’s failure to appear and defend in the Idaho action largely resulted from her own…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Louis Fennell v. Tlb Kent Company and Joseph PietrykaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Josephine C. Toscano AKA Josephine C. Zelasko v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. John O. England, Trustee of the Estate of Irene Mansfeldt, Bankrupt v. Morgan J. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. O'Link v. O'LinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Fernandez v. FernandezAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API