Legal Opinion

Moore v. Crisp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1963No. 39645PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

The parties will be referred to by name or by their trial court designation.

The plaintiff alleges he is the owner and holder of a first mortgage, executed by Wil-lice A. Crisp, covering certain real property in Oklahoma City. That Effie D. Crisp, Willice A. Crisp’s mother, is the holder of a second mortgage executed by Willice A. Crisp covering the identical property; that Willice A. Crisp failed to pay the taxes thereon and at tax sale the same was sold and certificates issued which certificates were afterwards assigned to Effie D. Crisp. The tax certificates were subsequently…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Smith v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Fair v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Porter v. LaffertySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Avery v. JuddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Koch v. Kiron State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Dome Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Vulcan Materials Co. v. Bee Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Buchanan v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Moore v. CrispSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Vulcan Materials Co. v. Bee Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API