Richard R. Allen, Sr., a Resident of Fayetteville, Nc v. United States of America, Acting by and Through the Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERVIN, Circuit Judge:
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and taxpayer Allen dispute whether § 163(h) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) of 1986 is facially ambiguous, and further, whether Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.163 — 9T(b)(2)(i)(A), which prohibits the deduction of individual income tax deficiency interest, is a valid regulation. See I.R.C. § 163(h)(1986); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.163-9T (1987). The district court found for Allen, ruling that the language of § 163(h) is clear, unambiguous, and in conflict with Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.163-9T(b)(2)(i)(A).
As the expert agency charged with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rowan Cos. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Frank Polk and Marie PolkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Polk v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- William v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Nick Kikalos and Helen Kikalos v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Alfaro v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Michael McDonnell Mary McDonnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Robinson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.