Legal Opinion

Richard R. Allen, Sr., a Resident of Fayetteville, Nc v. United States of America, Acting by and Through the Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1999No. 98-1401PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERVIN, Circuit Judge:

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and taxpayer Allen dispute whether § 163(h) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) of 1986 is facially ambiguous, and further, whether Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.163 — 9T(b)(2)(i)(A), which prohibits the deduction of individual income tax deficiency interest, is a valid regulation. See I.R.C. § 163(h)(1986); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.163-9T (1987). The district court found for Allen, ruling that the language of § 163(h) is clear, unambiguous, and in conflict with Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.163-9T(b)(2)(i)(A).

As the expert agency charged with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Rowan Cos. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Frank Polk and Marie PolkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  5. Polk v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. William v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. Nick Kikalos and Helen Kikalos v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Alfaro v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Michael McDonnell Mary McDonnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Robinson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API