Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Frank Polk and Marie Polk

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1960No. 6202_1PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue from a decision of the Tax Court holding that interest on a personal income tax deficiency assessed against an individual taxpayer is a deduction “attributable to the operation of a trade or business” for the purpose of computing a net operating loss under Section 122(d) (5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 122(d) (5), where the deficiency on which the interest was paid resulted from an understatement by the taxpayer of his business income. The facts are without dispute and the sole question is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Kornhauser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. James J. Standing and Marie S. StandingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Shomaker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  2. Nick Kikalos and Helen Kikalos v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. James L. Redlark Cheryl L. Redlark v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Redlark v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1996
  5. Reise v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API