Legal Opinion
Adrian v. Sannier, Allen C. Youngblood, and Bruce S. King v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 23, 1991No. 90-3463PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners appeal the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB” or “Board”), In re Sannier, et al., 45 M.S.P.R. 420 (1990), dismissing their action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that petitioners had not alleged sufficient facts to establish constructive removal from their positions as Administrative Law Judges. If petitioners had made allegations sufficient to establish constructive removal, they would have been entitled to prior hearings and determinations of “good cause,” as required by 5 U.S.C. § 7521 (1988), before agency…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Neal Kenneth Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Margaret J. Schultz v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Donald R. Manning v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Sheila T. Rose v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tunik v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Larry J. Butler v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Theodore Stephens v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and Department of Health and Human Services, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- James W. Lawson v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Lloyd L. Tunik v. M.S.P.B.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.