Legal Opinion
Lloyd L. Tunik v. M.S.P.B.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 11, 2005No. 2003-3286Published
1Opinion of the Court
407 F.3d 1326
Lloyd TUNIK, Petitioner, and
Verrell Dethloff, Thomas S. Robinson, Marguerite Schellentrager, Karen Baker, Bryan Bernstein, and Tela L. Gatewood, Petitioners, and
Joseph Schloss, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, and
Social Security Administration, Intervenor.
No. 03-3286.
No. 03-3330.
No. 03-3331.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
DECIDED: May 11, 2005.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Michael J. Kator, Kator, Parks & Weiser, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioners.
1
Calvin M. Morrow, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Merit…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.