Legal Opinion
G v. Fay Sch., Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:15–CV–40116–TSHPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*389Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Experts
Defendants move to exclude the reports, opinions, and testimony of five of Plaintiffs' disclosed expert witnesses: David Carpenter, M.D. ("Dr. Carpenter"), Jeanne Hubbuch, M.D. ("Dr. Hubbuch"), Martha Herbert, M.D. ("Dr. Herbert"), Karl Maret, M.D., Ph.D. ("Dr. Maret"), and Robert Bowdoin ("Mr. Bowdoin").
Per Federal Rule of Evidence 702, a witness who is qualified as an expert may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise provided that(a) the expert's scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- G. v. The Fay SchoolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Wright v. Capella Univ., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Barcelo v. WelchDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Brown v. L.A. Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Ornelas v. Capella University, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.