Legal Opinion

Hotpoint Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 5, 1954No. 49524PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The plaintiff brought suit in this court pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944. 1 The plaintiff is suing for $18,934.88, representing charitable contributions made by it during the years 1942 to 1945 on the ground that the contributions are reimbursable costs under its cost-plus-fixed-fee contract with the War Department (now the Department of the Army.) The plaintiff’s contract, entered into on March 18, 1942, did not expressly provide for reimbursement of charitable contributions. The contract was for the installation and operation of an ordnance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Hongkong & Whampoa Dock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1915
  3. Federal Cartridge Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dana Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. In Re Valley Vue Joint VentureUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  3. S.W. Aircraft Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  4. Bishop Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. K E C O Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API