Legal Opinion

Custom Controls Co. v. MDS Qantel, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 24, 1987No. 01-87-00282-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM BASS, Justice.

Appellant brought suit against Computer Results, Inc. (“Computer Results”), Mohawk Data Sciences Corp. (“Mohawk”), and MDS Qantel, Inc. (“Qantel”) to recover damages for a defective computer system. Appellant non-suited Computer Results and tried its case against the remaining defendants to the court. At the close of appellant’s case-in-chief, appellee moved for judgment, without resting its case, arguing that appellant had failed to show any wrongdoing by Mohawk and Qantel. The court granted appellee’s motion and rendered a take-nothing judgment. On appeal, appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knight v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Home Savings Ass'n v. GuerraTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gibraltar Savings Ass'n v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Rhinetubes, Inc. v. Norddeutscher LloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Colonial Leasing Co. of New England v. Kinerd, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Barrett v. United States Brass Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. Knowlton v. United States Brass Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Barrett v. United States Brass Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  5. Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API