Legal Opinion

Barrett v. United States Brass Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 14, 1993No. 01-91-01279-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM BASS, Justice.

The appellants appeal from a final judgment denying them recovery under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA)1 and granting the appellee, United States Brass Corporation (U.S. Brass), judgment notwithstanding the verdict on their DTPA cause of action. U.S. Brass brings cross-points challenging the appellants’ recovery on their negligence cause of action and any potential recovery on their DTPA cause of action.

We are asked to decide three issues: (1) Should the 23 appellants who recovered under negligence be allowed to recover under their DTPA cause of action? (2)…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  3. Gunn Infiniti, Inc. v. O'BYRNETexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Avary v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  5. S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API