Legal Opinion

Jaroslav Sedivy v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Defense of the United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 26, 1973No. 72-2065PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

We are called upon to review the propriety of a permanent injunction issued by the district court, a federal civilian court, which prohibits the trial of an army sergeant by court-martial on the theory that the military court lacked jurisdiction under O’Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258, 89 S.Ct. 1683, 23 L.Ed.2d 291 (1969). The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Army, and the court-martial’s convening authority, a general officer, have appealed.

A general court-martial had been convened to try Army Sergeant First Class Sedivy for possession…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Graham v. HenegarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Robert Wayne Grant, 38013. v. Marvin Hogan, Warden, U.S. N.E.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Norman Rothman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Dawes v. Philadelphia Gas CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API