Legal Opinion

Stocking v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 1984No. A8209-05709; CA A27739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*600BUTTLER, J.

Plaintiff in this employment discrimination action contends that defendant terminated his employment and refused to reinstate him because he had suffered a compensable injury and had received workers’ compensation benefits while working for defendant. ORS 659.410, 659.415. He appeals from a summary judgment for defendant, and we reverse and remand.

Plaintiff sustained an on-the-job injury on February 10, 1981, and received temporary total disability benefits for the period February 11 to May 12,1981. He was a member of Teamsters Local 206, which represented the bargaining unit of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Vaughn v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Callan v. Confederation of Oregon School AdministratorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Williams v. Waterway Terminals Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Stocking v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Williams v. Waterway Terminals Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API