Williams v. Waterway Terminals Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentRossman, J.
I respectfully dissent. I have a deep concern that the majority opinion misconstrues ORS 659.415(1) and the intent of Oregon’s laws that prohibit employment discrimination against disabled workers who file workers’ compensation claims.
As I see it, the issue in this case is when, if ever, did plaintiffs claim for relief under ORS 659.415(1) accrue? The beginning point in this inquiry is that statute, which, at the relevant time, provided in part:
“A worker who has sustained a compensable injury shall be reinstated by the worker’s employer to the worker’s former position of employment upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vaughn v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Dobie v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Shaw v. Doyle Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Carney v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Carney v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.