Legal Opinion

Bundy v. Voelker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 23, 1920No. 21,575PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the district court for Winona county to recover $542.53. The facts are stated in the opinion. The ease was tried before Callaghan, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $256.70. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, Nie Meyer appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

The complaint alleges that defendants employed plaintiff to buy cabbage for them and agreed to pay him $1.05 per hundred pounds for all that he should purchase and deliver in cars on track at Winona, that he purchased and delivered on track a carload which defendants refused to receive or pay for, and demands judgment for the agreed price. The separate answer of defendant Meyer denies employing plaintiff and alleges that on September 25, 1918, defendant contracted to buy from plaintiff two carloads of good marketable Holland cabbage; that plaintiff delivered two carloads of. cabbage…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fontaine v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Russell v. Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Bundy v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API