Bundy v. Meyer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal reported in 145 Minn. 19, 175 N. W. 1000, the case was tried before Callaghan, J., who at the close of the testimony-denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and a jury which returned a verdict for $269.53. From an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHaluam, J.
1. Plaintiff and defendant fell out over a transaction involving the purchase of a carload of cabbage. Plaintiff testified that in September, 1918, defendant’s agent, Yoelker, came to him, and, after some negotiation, said: “I got a telephone from Meyer this morning and he wants cabbages * * * I will tell you what I will do. I will give you twenty-one dollars a ton for all that you can get and load * * * and I says: ‘All right.’ ” Plaintiff bought up three carloads of cabbage. Two cars were-loaded and delivered and paid for by defendant. A third car, containing 25,670 pounds, was loaded but…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Crane v. C. Crane & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
- Stensgaard v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Rehm-Zeiher Co. v. F. G. Walker Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- E. L. Welch Co. v. Lahart Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Louis F. Dow Co. v. BittnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Western Hat & Manufacturing Co. v. Berkner Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Floodwood Mercantile Co. v. MagieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922