Legal Opinion

Potts v. Kimball

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 1, 1943No. 4705PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaNd, Judge

The Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office, in the instant interference proceeding, awarded priority of invention of the single count involved to the appellees, Vernon R. Kimball and Robert F. Dirkes (hereafter referred to as Kimball et al.). Louis M. Potts (hereafter referred to as Potts) has here appealed from the board’s decision.

The interference involves an application of Potts, filed March 25, 1931, and renewed May 3, 1939, and a patent of Kimball et al., No-2,135,376, issued November 1, 1938, on an application filed, October 22,1935. The real parties in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. SnyderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  2. Wheeler v. KleinschmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  3. Jorgensen v. KingslandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
  4. In re KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  5. Wasberg v. DitchfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API