Legal Opinion

Wasberg v. Ditchfield

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1946No. 5158; No. 5159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

These are cross-appeals in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners awarding priority of invention of the subject matter defined by counts 1 to 4, inclusive, 7, 9, 11,12, and 13 to appellee Wasberg in appeal No. 5159. and that defined by counts 5, 6, 8, and 10 to appellee Ditchfield in appeal No. 5158.

The interference is between Wasberg’s patent No. 2,313,106, issued March 9,1943, on an application, No. 400,234, filed June 28,1941, and an application of Ditchfield, No; 354,709, filed August 29; 1940.

The counts originated in Wasberg’s patent a.nd…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. Potts v. KimballCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  3. Temple v. LittlehaleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. In re RatiganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API