Legal Opinion

In re A. B. C. Welding Works, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 24, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

The facts are not in dispute. The only issue is whether the amendment of claim, offered by the Industrial Commissioner of New York, which enlarges the period of time as well as the amount of tax involved, comes within the rule laid down in Re G. L. Miller & Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 1930, 45 F.2d 115. I think it does. Directly in point is the decision of Judge Hulbert in Re Utility Consumers Service, Inc., 1941, 38 F.Supp. 102. The decision in Re Morgen Drug Co., Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1941, 42 F.Supp. 345, is not contra. In that case the period involved in the amendment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re G. L. Miller & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. In re Morgen Drug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  3. In re Utility Consumers Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re AM International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  2. In Re Limited Gaming of America, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API