In re Morgen Drug Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The City of New York petitioned the Court to review an order of a Referee in Bankruptcy denying petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended proof of claim.
The facts are not in dispute. Petitioner timely filed on September 26, 1940, a proof of claim for sales taxes for the years 1934-1940 in a lump sum of $1,000 and for the years 1933-1939 for business taxes in a lump sum of $500.00, allegedly owed to it by the bankrupt. The proof of claim expressly stated: “Notice is hereby given that the Comptroller of the City of New York reserves all of the City’s rights to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- In Re LipmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- In re KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- In re RoeberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- In Re Marshall's GarageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re AM International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Continental Motors Corporation v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Industrial Commissioner of New York v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- In Re Diversified Brokers Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973
- In re A. B. C. Welding Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.