Legal Opinion

In re Morgen Drug Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 2, 1941No. 75884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

The City of New York petitioned the Court to review an order of a Referee in Bankruptcy denying petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended proof of claim.

The facts are not in dispute. Petitioner timely filed on September 26, 1940, a proof of claim for sales taxes for the years 1934-1940 in a lump sum of $1,000 and for the years 1933-1939 for business taxes in a lump sum of $500.00, allegedly owed to it by the bankrupt. The proof of claim expressly stated: “Notice is hereby given that the Comptroller of the City of New York reserves all of the City’s rights to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. In Re LipmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. In re KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  4. In re RoeberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  5. In Re Marshall's GarageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re AM International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  2. Continental Motors Corporation v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. Industrial Commissioner of New York v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. In Re Diversified Brokers Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973
  5. In re A. B. C. Welding Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API