U. S. N. Co. v. American Express Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDWARD R. BECKER, District Judge.
I
We have before us defendant’s motion to dismiss this antitrust action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or comply with orders of court. While we firmly believe that such motions should be granted most sparingly, and in fact,- only in extreme circumstances, we feel that this case is appropriate for dismissal.
The complaint charges the defendant with continuing violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2; Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18; Section 1 of the Robinson-Patman Act,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kurt Von Poppenheim v. Portland Boxing & Wrestling CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Dyotherm Corporation v. Turbo MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Philippine Air Lines, a Corporation, and Qantas Airways, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- William P. Kenney v. California Tanker Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clarence Marshall, Jr. v. Allyn R. SielaffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- McKinnis v. Hartford LifeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Metadure Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984