Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Temporary State Commission of Investigation

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell G. Hunt, J.

This is an application by the petitioner to quash the subpoena issued by the respondent and directing the petitioner to appear and testify at a private hearing in New York City.

It is within the bounds of the powers of the judicial branch of government to concern itself when an agency of the State, such as the respondent, is charged, as herein, with harassment and lack of good faith in the issuance of a subpoena to attend before it or its representatives for examination. In such case, ‘‘ the courts should and will be quick and firm in halting the exercise of * * * powers for irrelevant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Carlisle v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Matter of Hirschfield v. . HanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Temporary State Commission on Living Costs & the Economy v. BergmanNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Beatty v. Commission of InvestigationNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API