Legal Opinion
Temporary State Commission on Living Costs & the Economy v. Bergman
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHyman Korn, J.
Motion Nos. 288, 292, 303 and 304 of December 23,1974 are consolidated for disposition.
This is an application by the Temporary State Commission on Living Costs and the Economy to compel these respondents to comply with its subpoenas duly issued pursuant to CPLR 2308 (subd. [b]). Respondents Bernard Bergman, Amram Kass and Anne Weiss move to quash the subpoena duces tecum issued by petitioner upon the National Bank of North America and American Bank and Trust Company for the bank records of these parties, while respondent Sigety cross-moves for an order quashing the subpoena issued upon him.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In Re Jacqueline Schofield, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Clifford O. Boren, Delta M. Boren and Clifford O. Boren Contracting Co., Inc. v. Lloyd M. Tucker, Special Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Carlisle v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Dunham v. OttingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gardner v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- New York State Commission on Government Integrity v. CongelNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Harlem Teams for Self-Help, Inc. v. Department of InvestigationNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Wagner v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Brodsky v. New York YankeesNew York Supreme Court · 2009