Burlington Fire Fighters' Ass'n v. City of Burlington
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.
Plaintiffs, Burlington Fire Fighters’ Association and the Burlington Fire Fighters’ Officers Association, challenge the validity of a retroactive provision of the City of Burlington’s (City) retirement ordinance. Plaintiffs sought to enjoin the City from enforcing the terms of an amendment to the City’s pension plan which requires retroactive contributions into the pension fund in exchange for increased benefits. The trial court denied the temporary injunction on November 15, 1984, and on March 25, 1986 it denied the permanent injunction. This appeal followed. We affirm.
Plaintiffs raise three…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Broughton v. PensacolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Bernice LandrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- State v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Stevens v. Department of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Bryant v. Town of EssexSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.