Legal Opinion
Andrus v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 1, 2015No. Case No. 3:13-cv-146(RNC)Published
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
Robert N. Chatigny, United States District Judge, Plaintiff brings this action against her former employer alleging discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-60(a)(l), violations of the Equal Pay-Act and failure to pay commissions in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § Sl-Nla.1 Defendants have moved for summary judgment. For the following reasons,-the motion is granted in part and denied in part,
I. .Background
Plaintiff was employed for twenty-five years at Dooney & Bourke, a company that designs and retails high-end handbags. Defs.’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Terry v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.