Legal Opinion
Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 17, 1996No. 94 C 2656PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Ine. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “T & B”), bring this action in five counts against defendant Panduit Corporation (hereinafter “Panduit”). On August 15, 1996 this Court granted Panduit’s motion for summary judgment as to four counts and reserved ruling on count II. Count II alleges that Panduit’s use of the trademark BARB-TY constitutes a misleading use under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1) and seeks cancellation of Panduit’s trademark registration…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Blau Plumbing, Inc. v. S.O.S. Fix-It, Inc., D/B/A A-Aaaabaab's Root RoddersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Liquid Controls Corporation v. Liquid Control CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. v. Panduit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997