Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
On remand following the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp., 65 F.3d 654 (7th Cir.1995), this Court entered summary judg*380ment in favor of defendant Panduit Corporation and against plaintiffs Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. (“collectively T & B”) in two Memorandum Opinions and Orders dated August 15, 1996 and October 17, 1996. Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp., 935 F.Supp. 1399 and 940 F.Supp. 1337 (N.D.Ill.1996). An appeal has…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nicholas Mares, Maria Mares, Adrian Mares v. Fred J. Busby, Jay Hackler, Joseph HodderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Provident Savings Bank v. Nick PopovichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. v. Panduit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Claude P. Brown and Grace W. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- In the Matter of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor. Cmc Heartland Partners v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.