Legal Opinion
Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 22, 1999No. 94 C 2656PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “T & B”) move for an order to delay adjudication of their extraterritorial Lanham Act claims against Panduit Corporation (hereinafter “Pan-duit”) until after adjudication of their domestic Lanham Act claims. The Court held oral arguments on September 2, 1999. This opinion expands upon the Court’s ruling and order entered on September 2, 1999. For the reasons previously discussed in open court and set forth below, T &…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Skiriotes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. v. Panduit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- IPOX Schuster, LLC v. Nikko Asset Management Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. Central Illinois Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Alcar Group, Inc. v. Corporate Performance Systems, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000