City of Philadelphia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
Before this Court is the appeal of the City of Philadelphia (Employer) from the May 28, 1991 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee who determined that Walter Barclay (Claimant) lost the use, for all practical intents and purposes, of both legs and entered an award for specific loss.
On November 27, 1966, Claimant was shot while in the course and scope of his employment as a police officer for Employer. Claimant was shot through the calf of his left leg, his shoulder, through his left lung and his spinal cord. As…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Turner v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Humphrey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Hartwell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Jessop Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Guthrie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Coker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999