Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1991No. 1297 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Before this Court is the appeal of the City of Philadelphia (Employer) from the May 28, 1991 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee who determined that Walter Barclay (Claimant) lost the use, for all practical intents and purposes, of both legs and entered an award for specific loss.

On November 27, 1966, Claimant was shot while in the course and scope of his employment as a police officer for Employer. Claimant was shot through the calf of his left leg, his shoulder, through his left lung and his spinal cord. As…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Turner v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Humphrey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Hartwell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Jessop Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Coker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. St. Joseph Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API