Legal Opinion

People v. CHICANTI

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1999No. B119988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J. *

I. Introduction

Defendant Antonio Chicanti was convicted by jury in counts 1 and 2 of robbery, in violation of Penal Code section 211, and in count 3 of felony evading an officer, in violation of Vehicle Code section 2800.2, subdivision (a). The jury found that a principal in the commission of the robberies in counts 1 and 2 was armed with a firearm within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022, subdivision (a)(1). The court sentenced defendant to the high term of five years in count 1, plus a one-year enhancement for the principal armed with a firearm allegation.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. CuevasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. EstrellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. AcevedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. SHAKHVALADYANCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. BrydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API