In Re Mundy
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
It is established by the weight of authority elsewhere and by our unanimous opinion in this state that the proceedings under the act here in question (Laws 1949, c. 314) are civil and not criminal in nature and that they offend no provision of criminal due process. See In re Moulton, 96 N. H. 370, 372-373, 374, and authorities cited, wherein we held this act constitutional on its face —at least so far as the constitutionality of the provisions now questioned are concerned. It follows that the defendants’ exceptions so far as they rest on the assumption that this is a criminal matter are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. WinglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Purks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Blizzard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.