Legal Opinion

Tidewater Coal Exchange, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 22, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

In this action of debt instituted by the Tidewater Coal Exchange, Incorporated, against New Amsterdam Casualty Company, upon three several indemnity bonds, a motion by the plaintiff to strike defendant’s equitable answer or defense was made and granted. (D. C.) 20 F.(2d) 951. The plaintiff has now demurred to the absque hoe plea, subsequently filed by the defendant to the breach first assigned in each of the counts of the declaration, namely, that Coale & Co., a member of the Exchange and the principal in the bonds, has not indemnified and saved harmless the Tidewater…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coyle v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  2. Tidewater Coal Exchange, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1927
  3. Coyle v. Morrisdale Coal Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  4. New River Collieries Co. v. SniderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  5. Read v. Tidewater Coal Exchange, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API