Legal Opinion

Coyle v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 6, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEARNED HAND, District Judge.

This is like the Morrisdale Case with two exceptions: First, the confiscation of some 3,000 and odd tons of coal which had actually arrived at tidewater; second, the set-off of credits purchased after the exchange closed.

The first arose from the right exercised by the government during the coal shortage to seize coal anywhere and belonging to any one. If the matter rested there, I should regard the confiscation as a pool loss. I have already in the New River Collieries Case, 284 Fed. 287, stated my reasons for believing that each pool was to be treated as a mass…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New River Collieries Co. v. SniderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pioneer Home Builders, Inc. v. International Bank of Commerce (In Re Pioneer Home Builders, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1992
  2. Barr v. Weber (In Re Carousel Candy Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  3. Coyle v. Duncan Spangler Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Tidewater Coal Exchange, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1927
  5. Hunter Press, Inc. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API