New River Collieries Co. v. Snider
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the CourtLearned Hand, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
This is a bill in equity, based upon the rights of property of the members of pool 1, whom the plaintiff seeks to represent. It must therefore depend upon some common interest of all the members of that pool in property which has come to the hands of the defendants. These have only cash and no coal, so that the question is irrelevant whether the members of a pool were originally, and indeed always remained, co-owners of all the coal in that pool, or whether they or the exchange had title to it. The collections here in suit arose out of loans or sales of coal…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Coyle v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- Coyle v. Duncan Spangler Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
- Tidewater Coal Exchange, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1927
- Coyle v. Morrisdale Coal Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- Read v. Tidewater Coal Exchange, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.