Theodoros Michaelidis v. Daniel Weiss, et al.

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Theodoros Michaelidis, No. CV-26-03005-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Daniel Weiss, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court are two motions to dismiss. (Docs. 4, 5.) For the reasons set out 16 below the Court will grant both motions subject to limited leave to amend.1 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 The following facts are taken from Plaintiff Theodoros Michaelidis’s First 19 Amended Complaint (“FAC”).2 This case arises out of a dispute over Plaintiff’s 20 employment contract (the “Agreement”) with Defendant…