Legal Opinion

McGuirk v. Ward

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 4, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.

This is an action of contract for the recovery of part of the consideration for an option to purchase real estate. The case was tried by the court with a resulting judgment for the defendant to recover his costs and for the discharge of the trustee. The case is here on exceptions of the plaintiff.

The facts as found by the court, to which no exceptions were taken, show that the plaintiff owned certain premises in the City of Rutland. He gave the defendant an option to purchase the same which was in a writing signed by the plaintiff but not by the defendant who, however, orally agreed to its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neely v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Richanbach v. RubyOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Watkins v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Carter v. McCallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Carvage v. StowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. LaPlante v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
  2. Buchannon v. BillingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
  3. Johnny Ray Sports, Inc. v. Wachovia BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Quinn v. Beverages of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API