Legal Opinion
Young v. Pannell Fitzpatrick & Co.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided August 8, 1986No. Civ. 85-2075 (RLA)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ACOSTA, District Judge.
Present before the Court for disposition is defendant’s motion to quash summons and for dismissal of this action for lack of in personam jurisdiction filed on February 7, 1986 (Docket No. 9). Plaintiffs filed an opposition thereto on March 31,1986 (Docket No. 15).
An amended complaint was filed on April 24, 1986 (Docket No. 19) 1 based on diversity of citizenship between the parties, 28 U.S.C. sec. 1332. Plaintiffs, L. Bennett Young (Young) and Comerica Bank-Detroit (Comerica) are citizens of Michigan and defendant, Pannell Fitzpatrick & Company (PF & C)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arce v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
- Carmona Ríos v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001
- Rafael Margarida & Co. v. Audi of America, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1989
- Reebok International Ltd. v. SebelenDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1996
- Sergio Estrada Rivera Auto Corp. v. KimDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.