Legal Opinion

Lytle v. Lytle

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1989No. 89-292PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Mrs. Gula Lytle appeals the chancellor’s order reducing the alimony she is to receive from Dr. Jimmie E. Lytle from $1500 to $250 per month. We cannot say that the factual findings of the chancellor were, as Mrs. Lytle contends, clearly erroneous, nor do we find we should reverse the chancellor’s conclusion which we review de novo.

Upon a prior appeal we affirmed a decree divorcing the parties although we remanded the case because of an error in property division. Lytle v. Lytle, 266 Ark. 124, 583 S.W.2d 1 (1979). The alimony award was not contested in the earlier…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Lytle v. LytleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Pinkston v. PinkstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Sowards v. SowardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Nix v. NixCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roe v. DietrichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Germer v. Missouri Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API