City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
¶ 1. The City of Janesville initiated this action for a writ of assistance to remove CC Midwest, Inc., from property the City had acquired by exercising its power of eminent domain. The City also sought a declaration that it had satisfied all its obliga tions under Wis. Stat. ch. 32 1 and was therefore entitled to possession. The issue on appeal is whether the circuit court correctly concluded that the City had met its obligation under Wis. Stat. § 32.05(8)(b) and (c) to make available to CC Midwest a comparable replacement property before requiring CC Midwest to vacate. We conclude that,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Racine v. BassingerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- C. Coakley Relocation Systems, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- Blum ex rel. Studinski v. 1st Auto & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007