Legal Opinion

City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 26, 2006No. 2004AP267PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

¶ 1. The City of Janesville initiated this action for a writ of assistance to remove CC Midwest, Inc., from property the City had acquired by exercising its power of eminent domain. The City also sought a declaration that it had satisfied all its obliga tions under Wis. Stat. ch. 32 1 and was therefore entitled to possession. The issue on appeal is whether the circuit court correctly concluded that the City had met its obligation under Wis. Stat. § 32.05(8)(b) and (c) to make available to CC Midwest a comparable replacement property before requiring CC Midwest to vacate. We conclude that,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. City of Racine v. BassingerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. C. Coakley Relocation Systems, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  3. Blum ex rel. Studinski v. 1st Auto & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API