Legal Opinion
C. Coakley Relocation Systems, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 14, 2007No. 2006AP2292PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKessler, J.
¶ 1. C. Coakley Relocation Systems, Inc. (Coakley) appeals from a judgment and an order dismissing its amended complaint which sought relocation payments and other damages from the City of Milwaukee. The trial court dismissed Coakley's amended complaint because it concluded that Coakley was entitled only to relocation payments authorized by Wis. Stat. ch. 32 and that the complaint seeking those payments was barred by the statute of limitations set out in Wis. Stat. § 32.20 (2003-04). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. Roadster LLC, an affiliated company to Coak-ley, owned a parking lot which it leased…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Cohn v. Town of RandallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- City of Racine v. BassingerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- C. Coakley Relocation Systems, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Kent County Prosecutor v. Kent County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Blum ex rel. Studinski v. 1st Auto & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- C. Coakley Relocation Systems, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008