City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 75. (dissenting). When the court of appeals certified this eminent domain case to our court, it pointed to the difficulty of interpreting and applying the statutory language in Wis. Stat. *645§§ 32.05 and 32.19. It also recognized the statewide implications of a decision on this subject. After this court declined to grant the certification, the court of appeals undertook a careful review of the statutes as well as the cases and policy, actively participated in more than three hours of oral argument, and then produced an outstanding appellate opinion that is linear, clear, and highly persuasive.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.