Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kendrick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1985No. 847PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from a lower court order granting a motion to suppress. The Commonwealth contends that the warrantless search of appellee, Willie Kendrick, was lawful and, therefore, the lower court erred in suppressing the evidence. We agree and reverse the lower court’s suppression order.

The facts of this case may be quickly summarized. On January 11, 1983, narcotics detectives received information from an informant regarding the sale of heroin at the residence of Buzzy (Craig Owens) and Mary Emma. The detectives used this information, along with information gathered from…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. LuczkiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. QuilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. DennisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API