Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Koppers Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a negligence and strict products liability action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.), dated June 15, 1984, which granted the separate motions by the defendant and third-party plaintiff and by the third-party defendant Allied Chemical Corporation, Barrett Division (hereinafter Allied Chemical), to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the causes of action therein were barred by the Statute of Limitations and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Thornton v. Roosevelt HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bikowicz v. Nedco Pharmacy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Harrell v. Koppers Company, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Glod v. Ashland Chemical Co.New York Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Riebow v. Quemetco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Militello v. Frank & Leo Piotrowski Builders, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API